|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Management & Organizational History, Vol. 2, No. 2,
135-152 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1744935907078725
© 2007 SAGE Publications
Devourer of our convictions: Populist and academic organizational theory and the scope and significance of the metaphor of `revolution'
Stephen Sheard
University of Bradford, SGSheard{at}aol.com
I focus on the interpretative significance of OT theories influenced in par t by sociology and set this discussion in a historical context. Looking initially at Hamel's theorization and then the influential theories of Hammer and Champy (re-engineering), I draw out an initial analysis of the rhetoric of'revolution' in OT. I contrast these analyses with more academic examples from OT (Burrell and Morgan [1979] and Ralph Stacey's [1996, 2000] complexity theory), which discuss the contrast between different `registers' of use of the term `revolution': the metaphoric which is associated with the commonplace deployment of'revolution' (e.g. `a revolution in advertising'), and the literal which is associated with great and significant events (especially political/historical).Together these uses comprise the scope of the rhetorical deployment of the metaphor of `revolution'. I argue that organizational theories play on a dynamic of tension between these two registers both at the level of sub-text (populist literature), but also at a meta-theoretic level (for example: Burrell and Morgan 1979). I also suggest that the organic theories of complexity present an intermediary case, between these extremes. I also argue that the rise of the term `revolution' in OT resonates with the Republican conception of revolution which is associated with the 18th century forebears of contemporary western liberal democracy. A consequence of this historiographic interpretation is that the modes of reasoning present at the inception of the enlightenment, and politically advanced by Republicanism, have a methodological impact. This effect may be felt in terms of a semantic relativism which underpins the flexibility of metaphor in OT, but which is ultimately subordinate to the anchor of a neo-liberal agenda.
Key Words: BPR • Burrell and Morgan • capital(ism) • Hamel • metaphor • republican(ism) • revolution
References
- Alvesson, M., and H. Wilmott. 1996. Making sense of management: A critical introduction. London: SAGE .
- Burrell, G. 1997. Pandemonium: Towards a retro-organization theory. London: SAGE .
- Burrell, G. and G. Morgan. 1979. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann .
- Campbell, P.R., ed. 2006. The origins of the French revolution: Problems in focus. Basingstoke : Palgrave MacMillan.
- Case, P. 1999. Remember re-engineering? The rhetorical appeal of a management salvation device . Journal of Management Studies, 36: 4 .
- Close, D. 1985. The meaning of revolution. In Revolution: A history of the idea, ed. D. Close and C. Bridge London: Croom Helm .
- Derrida, J. [1972] 1982. Margins of philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
- Dunn, J. 2005. Setting the people free: The story of democracy. London: Atlantic Books .
- Greiner, L.E. 1987. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. In Readings in strategic management, ed. D. Asch. and C. Bowman, 373—388. London: Macmillan .
- Grint, K. 1994. Re-engineering history: Social resonances and business process re-engineering . Organization 1, 179—201 .[Abstract]
- Grint, K. 1995. Utopian re-engineering. In Examining business process re-engineering, ed. G. Burke and J. Peppard, 82—107. London : Kogan Page .
- Grint, K. 1998. The violent rhetoric of re-engineering: Management consultancy on the offensive . Journal of Management Studies 5, 557—577 .
- Grint, K., and P. Case. 2000. `Now where are we?' BPR lotus eaters and corporate amnesia. In The re-engineering revolution: Critical studies of corporate change, ed. D. Knights and H. Wilmott, 26—50. London: SAGE .
- Hamel, G. 2002a. Gary Hamel. In Business minds, ed. T. Brown, S. Crainer, D. Dearlove and J.N. Rodrigues, 78—86. Harlow: Pearson Education .
- Hamel, G. 2002b. Leading the revolution: How to thrive in turbulent times by making innovation a way of life. London: McGraw-Hill .
- Hammer, M. 1988. Beyond re-engineering: How the process-centred organization is changing our work and lives. London: Harper Collins .
- Hammer, M. 2002. Michael Hammer. In Business minds, ed. T. Brown, S. Crainer, D. Dearlove and J.N. Rodrigues 86—92. Harlow: Pearson Education .
- Hammer, M., and J. Champy. [1993] 2001. Re-engineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. London : Brealey .
- Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neo-liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
- Hatto, A. 1949. Revolution: An enquiry into the usefulness of a historical term . Mind 58: 495—517 .
- Howell, P.A. 1985. Liberal thought about revolution from Locke to Mazzini. In Revolution: A history of the idea, ed. D. Close and C. Bridge London: Croom Helm .
- Kelly, S., and M.A. Allison. 1999. The complexity advantage: How the science of complexity can help your business achieve peak performance. New York: Mc-Graw Hill .
- Johnson, G. 1987. Rethinking incrementalism. In Readings in strategic management, ed. D. Asch and C. Bowman, 37—57. London: Macmillan .
- Kuhn, T.S. [1962] 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
- Morgan, G. [1986] 1997. Images of organization. London: SAGE .
- Rees, J. 1998. The algebra of revolution: The dialectic and the classical marxist tradition. London: Routledge .
- Stacey, R. [1993] 1996. Strategic management and organizational dynamics. London: Pitman .
- Stacey, R. 2000. Strategic management and organizational dynamics: The challenge of complexity. Harlow: Pearson .
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
